
As has been reported in the Harlow Star, Harlow Magistrates Court and the County Court are under threat from closure, following the Justice Department's review of the courts around the country. I oppose these closures and believe that Harlow needs a County Court and Magistrates Court. I also believe the move would impinge on local policing. For this reason, today, I have sent a submission to the Justice Ministry.
The MoJ's own consultation document admits that Harlow Magistrates' Court is a busy and thriving court with a 'reasonable' workload and it accepts that the court, which is used Monday to Friday, shares among the highest numbers of magistrates of any court in Essex.
I have also discussed the proposed closure was discussed when I met with Harlow Chief Superintendent Simon Williams who said the loss of the court would delay the issue of search warrants, which would have to be driven to Chelmsford, sworn in front of a magistrate and then driven back to Harlow.
In my view it is clear that the urban extensions that are planned and currently under development will add tens of thousands of population over the next ten years.
Harlow Magistrates' Court has the capacity to grow, to become a sub-regional hub. The Ministry of Justice consultation document statesthat 'additional land around the periphery of the courthouse has been secured for a possible rebuild/extension. A new cell block was built in 2008-09. The case for closing the court is made entirely on direct costs to the Ministry of Justice rather than holistic costs to the public purse.
There is no assessment of the increased costs of running a larger Chelmsford court, no assessment of the increased workload that will inevitably fall on the police with more warrants for non-attendance and no assessment of the greater travelling times and cost for local police officers to attend court in Chelmsford or to swear in search warrants out of normal working hours with magistrates in Chelmsford.
This will also mean police officers, because of the increased travel times, will be away from front-line duties. This incurs an opportunity cost. There is also presumably a cost to the Ministry of Justice budget in increased late and non-attendance caused by difficult travel. Some assessment of these points would help to determine whether the closure of Harlow Magistrates' Court is genuine value for money.
I wholeheartedly support the need to improve the efficiency and cost effectiveness of the HMCS magistrates’ estate. However my concerns are that Harlow Magistrates' Court is highly utilised, Harlow has a high crime-rate and the loss of the court would pose a major operational problem for local police.
Harlow is a major growth town and the court has recently been invested in, and has the capacity to grow. The court is linked to the police station by a tunnel so the building cannot be sold without major and expensive renovation. Taking all these factors into account, I am concerned that the true holistic cost of closure has not been assessed.
by Robert Halfon - www.roberthalfon.blogspot.com


